Thursday, August 07, 2008

Kissables (Reformulated)

Alert and distressed readers informed me that Hershey’s Kissables have been reformulated and not in a good way.

I was fortunate enough to find both the old variety and the new ones at the 99 Cent Only Store, which is like some sort of time capsule, just dig deep enough into the layers and you can find stuff that goes back to the last century. (Don’t worry, both were still within their expiry dates - made only five months apart.)

Kissables Candy Coated Milk ChocolateFirst, the Original Kissables, as introduced were called Candy Coated Milk Chocolate. (Original review from 2006 here.)

The ingredients: Milk chocolate (sugar, cocoa butter, chocolate, nonfat milk, milk fat, lactose, soy lecithin, PGPR & artificial flavors), sugar, red 40, yellow 5, yellow 6, blue 1 & carnauba wax.

The taste is familiar. The crunch of the shell is crispy and nondescript but gives way to the inimitable Hershey’s chocolate flavor that’s a little tangy, a bit like yogurt and has a rather interesting rum note to it.

Kissables Chocolate CandyThe new version is called Chocolate Candy which is code for chocolate-flavored confection, or candy that contains chocolate but can’t be called chocolate because it has other stuff in it that’s not permitted by the FDA definitions (like more oil than actual chocolate).

The ingredients: Sugar, vegetable oil (palm, shea, sunflower and/or safflower oil), chocolate, nonfat milk, whey, cocoa butter, milk fat, gum arabic, soy lecithin, artificial colors (red 40, yellow 5, blue 2, blue 1, yellow 6), corn syrup, resinous glaze, salt, carnauba wax, pgpr and vanillin.

They look exactly like their old “pure” counterparts (which really weren’t so pure if you ask me). The colors and size are identical. The flavor though, is quite obviously off. The crunch of the shell is familiar, but the flavor of the chocolate lacks any particular pop and feels less fresh. The texture is cooler on the tongue, though has the same fudgy grain that it’s always had.

Old and new Kissables

It’s not that the new formula is bad, but it certainly lacks a pizazz and familiarity that the old ones had. They old ones were like Kisses. The new ones are like, well, nothing much special. Kind of like chocolate frosting. As a mockolate product, well, they’re actually pretty good. These are still far and away better than the Garfield Chocobites or other off-brand/fake chocolate lentils I’ve had.

The ingredient tweaking had some interesting results as well, which show that it’s entirely possible to tell the two apart on taste alone:

..............Original Formula ....................2008 Formula
Calories.........210....................................200
Total Fat.........10 grams...............................10 grams
Cholesterol........5 mg...................................0 mg
Sodium............30 mg..................................60 mg
Carbohydrates.....28 g...................................30 g
Protein............3 g....................................1 g
Calcium............6%.....................................2%
Iron...............2%.....................................2%

(This info was taken right from the packages, the Hershey’s website lists strangely different nutritional specs for this size package - where the portion is only 1.4 ounces instead of the full 1.5 ounces in the package.)

So the new ones have more salt and sugars, a third of the calcium but no cholesterol. Ten fewer calories, but also made with all sorts of other replacement oils. Oh, and the new ones also have a resinous glaze, which is shellac, which is on most vegetarian’s forbidden list.

It strikes me as odd that Hershey’s new Pure Chocolate campaign comes on the heels of their attempts to dilute the definition of chocolate and have changed the formulation on many of their favorite candies (5th Avenue & Whatchamacallit) to include new coatings that are not pure chocolate any longer.

The copy goes like this (set to a cover of I Melt with You):

What makes a Hershey’s bar pure?
Pure simplicity.
Pure happiness.
Pure delicious chocolate.
Pure Hershey’s.

Watch the video here or here. While it’s for Hershey’s Milk Chocolate bar, I take it as a whole branding campaign that Hershey’s wants to stress that they make pure chocolate. I’m just not buying it.

More fun with new formulas: Check out what Hershey’s has done to the iconic Hershey’s Miniatures collection

Related Candies

  1. Hershey’s Website Inaccuracies
  2. Today Show: Kissed Off!
  3. ReeseSticks (Revisit)
  4. Hershey’s Miniatures
  5. Nestle Crunch Crisp
  6. What Made Hershey’s Want to Change Chocolate?
Name: Kissables (2008 formula)
    RATING:
  • 10 SUPERB
  • 9 YUMMY
  • 8 TASTY
  • 7 WORTH IT
  • 6 TEMPTING
  • 5 PLEASANT
  • 4 BENIGN
  • 3 UNAPPEALING
  • 2 APPALLING
  • 1 INEDIBLE
Brand: Hershey's
Place Purchased: 99 Cent Only Store (Wilshre Blvd.)
Price: $.39
Size: 1.5 ounces
Calories per ounce: 133
Categories: Mockolate, United States, Hershey's, Kosher

POSTED BY Cybele AT 1:51 pm    

Comments
  1. How utterly ridiculous considering the “Pure Chocolate” campaign. What an abolute joke!
    Thanks for the heat to head Cybele compelling and informative as ever.
    Jim

    Comment by Jim on 8/07/08 at 3:59 pm

     

  2. Thanks for the insight, Cybele.  I was a little skeptical about Kissables when I first saw them, but I found them to be pretty good.

    But my friend gave me some to try a week ago and it tasted like fake frosting to me.  Something was just wrong. I’m glad to see (sort of) that I wasn’t just imagining it or it was a bad batch.  “Pure Chocolate” if you’ve never tasted chocolate before.

    Something about it reminds me of 1984’s “Victory Chocolate”

    Comment by Meg on 8/07/08 at 5:49 pm

     

  3. Well, I tried the “old” Kissables, and I didn’t like them. So I never bought them again. I still don’t like them. We already have M&Ms;. I prefer Kisses over Kissables. To me, Kissables are “fake”. Yes, even with its original formula. To each, his/her own grin Thanks for the review. Very enlightening. I definitely won’t try the Kissables now! Oh, and I enjoy your blog. It gets me to buy candy from time to time, thanks to your blog. I’ve revisited candy from my childhood in recent days thanks to your blog grin

    Comment by Anna on 8/08/08 at 4:01 am

     

  4. So disappointing, on so many levels. I was at Hershey’s Chocolate World last night looking for the new Pumpkin Spice Kisses and came home with a Dagoba bar—just because unlike most Hershey products, it’s REAL pure chocolate.

    Milton Hershey is probably spinning like a lathe in his grave.

    Comment by Frances on 8/08/08 at 4:21 am

     

  5. I never liked Kissables to begin with, so I know I wouldn’t like them now, but I do agree that it sucks what they’re doing to chocolate. I think it’s an unexpected side effect of a bad economy with rising materials costs, like sneakily making packages smaller for the same price.

    Comment by Debby on 8/08/08 at 6:04 am

     

  6. They just keeping digging themselves into a deeper hole, aren’t they? *snort*

    Comment by Sera on 8/08/08 at 8:03 am

     

  7. I just wanted to let you know that Consumerist wrote about this and quoted you: http://consumerist.com/5034753/hersheys-kissables-no-longer-legally-considered-milk-chocolate

    Comment by Sasha on 8/08/08 at 9:26 am

     

  8. Hi, I am from Australia, and my co-worker bought back chocolate from America. AND ITS DISGUSTING!!!! It tastes like cheese and nothing like chocolate. Don’t you guys have any of the European chocolate? Like the stuff with just cocoa, butter and sugar?

    Your chocolate seems to consist of oil and sodium? HOW CAN THAT TASTE ANY GOOD?

    Comment by Emily on 8/08/08 at 7:18 pm

     

  9. I was angered when they made White Chocolate Reese’s into simply “White” Reese’s.

    I no longer buy Hershey’s products.

    Comment by Brad on 8/08/08 at 8:55 pm

     

  10. So, What’s next for Hershey’s?  A merger with Palmer’s?  They’ve obviously decided the market of people who want actual chocolate costs them too much profit margin to pursue…

    (The guys who make the really cheap Chocolate-Like Food Product type easter candies, if you don’t recognize the name...)

    Comment by Epicanis on 8/08/08 at 9:46 pm

     

  11. Who cares? Fat people will still eat them.

    Comment by Uriah Bennett on 8/09/08 at 6:00 am

     

  12. ^ See, this is what happens when Digg invades.

    Comment by Synonymous on 8/11/08 at 6:10 pm

     

  13. I’m wondering about the dark chocolate kissables--they are one of my favorite candies.  What will they call them “dark flavored almost chocolate candy like things"--I might need to stock up on the real stuff!

    Comment by girlbuffalo1 on 8/12/08 at 9:59 am

     

  14. Thank you for this article!  I thought I was losing my mind (or taste).  I was obsessed with Kissables for months, then noticed them slowly disappearing off the candy shelves.  When I stopped being able to find them I reverted to their “kissin cousin”, M&M;.  I recently “found” them again and they were terrible; I thought maybe they were just OLD.  Seems the truth is even worse.

    I will now attempt to get on with my life.

    Comment by Meghansaunt on 8/13/08 at 7:54 am

     

  15. This makes me so mad.  I used to like Kissables.  In fact, they’re one of the few chocolate candies I like. (Symphony bars also rank up there.) But now they’re just crap, like a lot of candy out there. =\

    Comment by Rita on 8/17/08 at 9:36 am

     

  16. Well drat. I preferred Kissables to plain M&Ms;, but I guess I won’t be buying them anymore!

    Comment by Tricia on 8/21/08 at 9:44 am

     

  17. I’m so sick of all these companies using fake products.  I know you focus on Chocolate, but have you noticed that Dryer’s and Bryer’s are now calling some of their ice creams “ frozen dessert” They dont contain enough dairy to be called Ice Cream.  Here in Canada, Bryer’s is going so far as to call it “ Frozen Indulgence”.  Indulgence my arse!!

    Comment by Randi on 8/22/08 at 7:24 am

     

  18. Have you see the book Hello Cupcake?  They author’s use lots of different candy in interesting ways.

    Comment by Randi on 8/22/08 at 7:25 am

     

  19. Hershey has been making the reformulated Kissables for several months now.  I picked up some bags of the Kissables they made for Valentine’s Day and Easter, and both of them said “chocolate candy.”

    Comment by Johnny Carruthers on 8/29/08 at 11:48 am

     

  20. Wow, unbelievable.  For years I cried over the disappearance of Hershey-ets. M&Ms;could not hold a candle to them. Then the Kissables came out and it was like being re-born!! I just bought a new package yesterday and thought, ugh what is the problem with these? I too thought they were old. Agree with Epicanis-tastes like Palmer fake chocolate.

    Comment by LouAnn on 9/03/08 at 10:37 am

     

  21. Now Hershey’s isn’t just being cheap, it’s being environmentally irresponsible.  Using palm oil destroys the orangutan habitat and is endangering wildlife.  http://www.cspinet.org/palm/

    Comment by J.M. on 9/19/08 at 4:59 am

     

  22. I picked up a little bag of kissables yesterday and noticed a difference in taste from the last time I had some… which was months ago. So your article is confirmed as far as I’m concerned; there is a substantial difference in taste.

    Comment by Thomas Springs on 10/12/08 at 1:31 pm

     

  23. Hmm. Here in Canada I have noticed that Kissables have left the shelves almost completely.  I figured that it was the demise of the reborn hershey-et again.  :-( First the disappearance of the hershey-et, then hersheys pieces, now kissables.  I will be equally disappointed if they bring out this lame attempt that you are describing.

    Has anyone thought to leave some feedback with Hershey directly??

    Comment by Hershey-et lover on 10/14/08 at 4:00 pm

     

  24. Hershey-et lover - yeah, unfortunately quite a few of us have written to Hershey’s and they insist that this is what we want and they make top notch products.

    If you’ve written to them, you can post their response here.

    Comment by Cybele on 10/14/08 at 4:08 pm

     

  25. I found your site on a google search after tasting a new bag and having to spit them out. Hershey has always had the best chocolate and the worlds worst marketing department. Now I guess they moved the marketing guys to the product development department. This is a real shame, I remember Hersheyettes from 40 years ago (plain and peanut!) and the incomparable taste of Hershey chocolate. The company survived for decades on one thing—great chocolate—what do they think they will finally beat Mars with lousy chocolate *and* lousy marketing?

    Comment by jcp on 11/04/08 at 1:48 pm

     

Name:

Email:
(not published)

Location:
(not published - please don't put your address in there)

URL:

Comments may be held for moderation to prevent spam and other violations of the Candy Blog Comment Policy

Remember me!

Get updates to comments on this post?

Next entry: Bel Chocolatey Bars

Previous entry: Kasugai Pineapple Gummy

Trackback URL: http://www.typetive.com/trackback/1963





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABOUT

FEEDS

SEARCH

  • Enter search term

CONTACT

EMAIL DIGEST

    For a daily update of Candy Blog reviews, enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

CANDY RATINGS

TYPE

BRAND

COUNTRY

ARCHIVES

Meticulously photographed and documented reviews of candy from around the world. And the occasional other sweet adventures. Open your mouth, expand your mind.

 

 

 

 


image

COUNTDOWN

Candy Season Ends

133 days

 

 

   

 

VOTE IN THE POLL

Which do you prefer?
Total Votes: 419
Milk Chocolate
90 %  41% (172)
 
Dark Chocolate
57 %  26% (111)
 
Really Dark Chocolate (70%+)
39 %  18% (76)
 
White Chocolate
30 %  14% (57)
 
Carob!
2 %  1% (3)
 

(see archived polls)

 

   Sweetservices.com

image 

image

image   

ON DECK

These candies will be reviewed shortly:

• Jersey Milk

• Coffee Rio

• Mr. Goodbar

• Starbucks Chocolate Eggnog Latte Truffles

• Bloomsberry & Co. Chocolate: Climate Change Chocolate

 

   

image 

 

 


   

image

image

   www.candyxpress.com

image

image

  

image