Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Head to Head! Smarties vs. M&Ms



Yes, in the continuing quest to not only bring you the best and worst candies in the world, I'm going to educate you on the subtleties between our seemingly identical candy choices.

Today I'm tackling the UK product, Smarties, which is made my Nestle and the American product M&Ms which are made by Mars.



First, a little background (some of this I only know vaguely so feel free to correct me). M&Ms were originally developed as a candy for soldiers to give them quick energy in combat situations and be easy to carry. Some people wonder what M&M stands for, and many think it's for the Mars brothers, but in reality it's Forrest Mars, Sr. and Bruce Murrie. Murrie's father was one of Hershey's trusted partners at the company and provided the chocolate inside M&Ms until the 70s.

As with most UK treats under the Nestle name, they were originally made by Rowntree which was later swallowed up by the growing Nestle corporation. Developed several years before the M&M, Smarties are still one of the most popular candies in the UK. The UK version are purported to have orange chocolate flavored orange Smarties (and back when there was a brown Smartie it was mocha flavored) but I am using Canadian Smarties for this head to head.



First, Smarties are slightly bigger than M&Ms. An M&M is approximately 1 cm in diameter while the Smartie is 1.5 cms.



However, the Smartie is slightly flatter than the M&M. I didn't weigh them.



The most noticeable difference between the two is the candy shell. The Smartie shell is much thicker and has a very pronounced crunch to it. It also seems to have a flavor. When I looked at the ingredients for the Smarties, I saw that there is wheat flour (and cornstarch & sugar) in the shell whereas the M&M shell is made only of sugar, cornstarch and color. The Smartie has a slightly graham cracker taste to it. It's pleasant and perhaps a little cinnamonny (I know there's no cinnamon in it). The M&M provides more chocolate punch. I guess geometry would tell me that even if the mass of the Smartie is the same as an M&M it still has more shell by virtue of being less spherical.

As appearances go, they're both exceptionally pretty candies. Given a choice between the two, I prefer less shell and more chocolate. In reality I usually buy Almond M&Ms more often than the plain ones, but if someone puts a bowl in front of me, I can hardly resist. But I can see that there would be times that I'd crave the cookie-like taste of the Smarties.

13 Comments:

fluffball26 said...

I luv m&ms thay r soo yummy

September 20, 2005 10:11 AM  
russ said...

I always thought Smarties were those kinder sour tabs I get at Halloween, the ones that make your brain bigger.

M&Ms are, maybe, the most addictive candy, ever.

September 20, 2005 12:23 PM  
Tindy said...

Yeah, that's what I know Smarties as....

But hey, different type of M&M-ish candy. I'm up for it!

Think I can get these in PA?

September 20, 2005 2:33 PM  
Nosher said...

What a fantastic post-- I've often challenged people to describe these differences, but all that most people can do is to say that Smarties are a little bigger and flatter than M&Ms. Good to know there's more to it than that!

September 20, 2005 3:42 PM  
Marvo said...

Those Smarties sound pretty good. Hey, have you ever had caramel M&Ms? I don't think they exist anymore, but a friend of mine gave me a bag about three years ago. Oh, they were good, albeit a little too sweet.

September 20, 2005 8:45 PM  
Jamie said...

They used to have dulce de leche M&Ms. Allegedly it was to appeal to the Hispanic market in the US.

They also had white chocolate Smarties in the UK with pastel colored shells. They were exceptionally pretty.

September 21, 2005 9:08 AM  
Randi said...

ive seen pastel type smarties here in canada in the bulk food store. the smarties i know( since im american) are the sweet tart kind. Have you done a wonderbar yet? Great candybar from canada.

September 24, 2005 9:06 PM  
Dumpling_Girl said...

Being in Canada, I have easy access to both Smarties and M&M's, and I don't have a clear preference. They're very different candies, and sometimes I would feel like having one and somtimes I would feel like having the other. By the way, I hope you're okay with me putting a link to your site on my foodie blog (http://nancyland.blogspot.com). I love your blog!

September 27, 2005 9:25 AM  
Cybele said...

Randi - I've never had a wonderbar, but you may now consider it on my list!

Dumpling_girl - glad you're reading! I've been browsing your site for a couple of weeks now and even sent my husband there to look around before his recent trip to Vancouver so he'd know where to eat (or where not to, as the case may be).

I agree that most candies may seem similar to outside observers, but many of us not only can tell the difference but are able to like them both the same.

September 27, 2005 5:29 PM  
Shelly said...

Hi, just found your yummy blog and will be linking to it. I must say the dark chocolate M&Ms are amazing. I had them in Ohio back in May. Alas, I haven't been able to get any since and have been settling for dark chocolate Hershey Kisses for a quick dark chocolate fix. But I do love regular M&Ms.

September 28, 2005 9:15 AM  
Laura Lynn Foster said...

I find the M&Ms have a nuttier taste to them, compared to Smarties, so if I'm in the mood for nuts, I get the Peanut M&Ms instead of the plain ones.

Quirky, aren't I?

Love your blog!

November 04, 2005 12:57 PM  
Conspiracy Guy said...

I was wondering about which came first and found out that smarties came out in 1937 while m&Ms came out in 1941. That made me wonder if m&ms are to smarties as pepsi is to coke?

November 08, 2005 8:20 PM  
Mikester said...

M&M's all the way, Smarties are garbage compared to M&M's... who's with me??

November 16, 2005 4:24 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home